Comments on: TERRY TATE: READING IS FUNDAMENTAL http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html Education & Training Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:40:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: TheREALspankum http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html/comment-page-1#comment-187 TheREALspankum Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:11:14 +0000 http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html#comment-187 Terry Tate is the main reason I voted for Obama. Come on Barrack! Show Terry some love, promote him to White House linebacker. Terry Tate is the main reason I voted for Obama. Come on Barrack! Show Terry some love, promote him to White House linebacker.

]]> By: inflateyourtires http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html/comment-page-1#comment-186 inflateyourtires Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:28:39 +0000 http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html#comment-186 Palin will make a much better President than VP anyway. Don't be skeared- Palin will make a much better President than VP anyway.
Don’t be skeared-

]]> By: peopledozer http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html/comment-page-1#comment-185 peopledozer Sun, 22 Feb 2009 03:26:03 +0000 http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html#comment-185 This is the funniest thing I've seen all day. This is the funniest thing I’ve seen all day.

]]> By: ChrisFlyingOne http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html/comment-page-1#comment-184 ChrisFlyingOne Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:19:09 +0000 http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html#comment-184 And a whole 416 days later she finally tells us what she supposedly reads, and what does she say? Newsmax. Why do some people actually like her? And a whole 416 days later she finally tells us what she supposedly reads, and what does she say?

Newsmax.

Why do some people actually like her?

]]> By: leroyinc http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html/comment-page-1#comment-183 leroyinc Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:47:04 +0000 http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html#comment-183 Regardless of whether you like Palin, Couric acted totally unprofessional in this exchange. The question, in the first place, was not very important and yet Couric pushed it for no apparent reason other than to frustrate her interviewee. Regardless of whether you like Palin, Couric acted totally unprofessional in this exchange. The question, in the first place, was not very important and yet Couric pushed it for no apparent reason other than to frustrate her interviewee.

]]> By: Vonpars http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html/comment-page-1#comment-182 Vonpars Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:38:05 +0000 http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html#comment-182 Haha this is fantastic Haha this is fantastic

]]> By: crazyfreakypunk http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html/comment-page-1#comment-181 crazyfreakypunk Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:42:34 +0000 http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html#comment-181 HOLY SHIT HAHAHAHA! HOLY SHIT HAHAHAHA!

]]> By: brogginsun http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html/comment-page-1#comment-180 brogginsun Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:48:25 +0000 http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html#comment-180 Yeah, it's unprofessional to continue to pursue a simple answer to a simple question when someone is sidestepping your question. All Sarah had to do is to name a few sources of news she regularly reads. The fact that she couldn't probably means she wasn't reading anything regularly at that point. An answer to that simple question was the correct path for Sarah to take unless the true answer was "Nothing at all, Katie." Yeah, it’s unprofessional to continue to pursue a simple answer to a simple question when someone is sidestepping your question. All Sarah had to do is to name a few sources of news she regularly reads. The fact that she couldn’t probably means she wasn’t reading anything regularly at that point. An answer to that simple question was the correct path for Sarah to take unless the true answer was “Nothing at all, Katie.”

]]> By: brogginsun http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html/comment-page-1#comment-179 brogginsun Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:56:42 +0000 http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html#comment-179 Romney could have answered that question. Huckabee could have answered that question. Obama could have answered that question. Biden could have answered that question. I could could have answered that question. About anyone who keeps up with current news could answer that question. Sarah Palin couldn't answer that question. Romney could have answered that question. Huckabee could have answered that question. Obama could have answered that question. Biden could have answered that question. I could could have answered that question. About anyone who keeps up with current news could answer that question. Sarah Palin couldn’t answer that question.

]]> By: leroyinc http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html/comment-page-1#comment-178 leroyinc Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:10:34 +0000 http://smartauthortraining.com/terry-tate-reading-is-fundamental.html#comment-178 When the question is trivial, yes, it is unprofessional to pursue it after an answer -- although a poor one -- has been given. The media did not treat Palin like they would treat Obama or any other political candidate; they asked arbitrary questions (e.g., "What do you think of the Bush Doctrine?") and simple questions ("What do you read?") that demanded no further response. They were upset that McCain picked an obscure candidate and acted like whiney children in response. When the question is trivial, yes, it is unprofessional to pursue it after an answer — although a poor one — has been given. The media did not treat Palin like they would treat Obama or any other political candidate; they asked arbitrary questions (e.g., “What do you think of the Bush Doctrine?”) and simple questions (”What do you read?”) that demanded no further response. They were upset that McCain picked an obscure candidate and acted like whiney children in response.

]]>