TERRY TATE: READING IS FUNDAMENTAL




Sarah Palin gets a startling brand new subscription. maps.google.com to find out where to opinion Go to www.ReturnOfTerryTate.com to see some-more videos… Terry Tate “How’s which for Drill Baby Drill! You only subscribed to Terry’s Journal of Pain!! And a initial emanate is free, baby! Whoo!! … Hey Katie!”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

23 Responses

  1. fortis17 Says:

    what are you talking about. he triple T clearly said the ‘pain train’ is coming in his 1st video, Terry Tate: Office Linebacker. Why would he say the Palin Train, then tackle the crap out of her. Your logic makes no sense.

  2. BlackpeopleLOL Says:

    You meant “palin train” surely?

  3. BlackpeopleLOL Says:

    wow the mysoginy of the left never ceases to amaze me.

    You homosexuals dominate many industries. You can afford all the rent boys you want. Yet you are still so unhappy. It’s sad to see.

  4. fortis17 Says:

    Can’t nobody stop the pain train baby.

  5. MariosLasagna Says:

    I know junior high students that make more sense than Palin.

  6. tbonehwd Says:

    OMG – I love this video has anyone checked out Going Rouge, Sarah Palin – An American Nightmare? I read it and it is great I haven’t found it on Amazon yet but I got mine from HCI Books

  7. faye303 Says:

    LOL!!! Hey Katiee. lmao that bit is so funny!!

  8. johns375 Says:

    I disagree, I think the news media should do more of it. Sure from time to time it might overstep, and certainly we don’t want a reporter’s agenda coming out in the interview, but if a politician is sidestepping or is responding to a question not asked… it should be pursued. The News (all of them) should make a presidential election as difficult as possible. The politicians who are smart and respect the office will prepare have answers, and if they don’t , they should just say so

  9. johns375 Says:

    is that sarcastic? They seem like fair questions to me, especially to people who are actually in office. Bush Doctrine isn’t something a regular dude would know, but anyone in Government knows what you are talking about when u say that

  10. leroyinc Says:

    You are right: I think Sarah Palin did a terrible job in that interview and was not qualified to be Vice President. That said, I still believe Katie Couric and the rest of the media acted unprofessionally.

  11. brogginsun Says:

    Hi. I’m Sarah Palin. I want to be a heartbeat away from Commander In Chief? What do I read regularly? Unfair! Unfair! What is the Bush Doctrine? Unfair! Unfair! What to I interpret the Bush Doctine to be? Unfair! Unfair!

  12. rakimfan Says:

    That was a fairly easy question. Blaming Couric doesn’t excuse her inability to address basic iissues throughout the campaign. This was just the tip of the iceberg.

  13. brogginsun Says:

    All she had to do is to tell Couric what she regularly read. And, she could have told Gibson what she thought of the Bush doctrine instead of looking like a deer in headlights. When he next asked her what she interpreted the Doctrine to be, she simply had to tell Gibson what her interpretation of the Bush Doctrine was. It was obvious she had never heard of the Bush Doctrine. Shouldn’t we ask both difficult and easy questions of candidates and expect answers instead of dodges?

  14. leroyinc Says:

    When the question is trivial, yes, it is unprofessional to pursue it after an answer — although a poor one — has been given. The media did not treat Palin like they would treat Obama or any other political candidate; they asked arbitrary questions (e.g., “What do you think of the Bush Doctrine?”) and simple questions (”What do you read?”) that demanded no further response. They were upset that McCain picked an obscure candidate and acted like whiney children in response.

  15. brogginsun Says:

    Romney could have answered that question. Huckabee could have answered that question. Obama could have answered that question. Biden could have answered that question. I could could have answered that question. About anyone who keeps up with current news could answer that question. Sarah Palin couldn’t answer that question.

  16. brogginsun Says:

    Yeah, it’s unprofessional to continue to pursue a simple answer to a simple question when someone is sidestepping your question. All Sarah had to do is to name a few sources of news she regularly reads. The fact that she couldn’t probably means she wasn’t reading anything regularly at that point. An answer to that simple question was the correct path for Sarah to take unless the true answer was “Nothing at all, Katie.”

  17. crazyfreakypunk Says:

    HOLY SHIT HAHAHAHA!

  18. Vonpars Says:

    Haha this is fantastic

  19. leroyinc Says:

    Regardless of whether you like Palin, Couric acted totally unprofessional in this exchange. The question, in the first place, was not very important and yet Couric pushed it for no apparent reason other than to frustrate her interviewee.

  20. ChrisFlyingOne Says:

    And a whole 416 days later she finally tells us what she supposedly reads, and what does she say?

    Newsmax.

    Why do some people actually like her?

  21. peopledozer Says:

    This is the funniest thing I’ve seen all day.

  22. inflateyourtires Says:

    Palin will make a much better President than VP anyway.
    Don’t be skeared-

  23. TheREALspankum Says:

    Terry Tate is the main reason I voted for Obama. Come on Barrack! Show Terry some love, promote him to White House linebacker.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.